The Albanese Government's choice of Jillian Segal as antisemitism envoy has sparked warnings over academic independence and growing limits on criticism of Israel, writesMark Beeson.

NOT CONTENT with trying to silence critics and sources of independent opinion within the United States, the Trump Administration is attempting to increase its influence over the rest of the world. At a time when many people have lost faith in the possibility of objective analysis, this will only give comfort to the growing number of autocrats who want to shape public opinion in ways that suit their interests, prejudices and policies.

In a world where the leaders of other countries have been queuing up to demonstrate their supine fealty to Trump in the hope that the most powerful man in the world might look favourably upon them, reputable, independent sources of information ought to be welcomed, not closed down. Predictably enough, however, this is precisely what Trumps lackeyshave done.

The United Nations has become one of the few places in which the voices of the marginalised, oppressed and forgotten are occasionally given a hearing, even if their opinions are studiously ignored. Given the UNs many failings and its lack of resources, influence and impact, it is remarkable that America has sanctioned the redoubtableFrancesca Albanese, the UN special rapporteur for the West Bank and Gaza.

Zionist propaganda tries to extend the historical antisemitism of Europe to the Muslim world and make it into a centuries-long horror.

Albaneses crime was not just to draw attention to the ethnic cleansing that Israel is conducting in Gaza, but to also highlight the reality thatother governmentsshirk their obligations, [and] far too many corporate entities have profited from the Israeli economy of illegal occupation, apartheid and nowgenocide.

Whether members of the Trump Administration are too dim to realise that their heavy-handed actions have drawn more attention to thewar crimesbeing perpetrated in Gaza or simply confident that they can do whatever the hell they want with no fear of pushback from the international community is a moot point. The continuing slaughter of women and children is not in doubt, unfortunately.

Despite this,many countries, especially among Americas traditional allies, are reluctant to criticise, much less sanction, Israels continuing destruction of Gaza and its people. Indeed, not even the proposal to build aconcentration campto imprison the remaining population has drawn much negative commentary. Perhaps no one wants to get in the way ofTrumps redevelopment plans.

Whats even more remarkable, perhaps, is that countries like Australia seem intent on mimicking the sort of crackdown on supposed bastions of independent thought like universities thatTrump has overseenin the U.S.

The Albanese Governments appointment ofJillian Segalas a special envoy to combat antisemitism is a noteworthy response to an outbreak of arson attacks and vandalism, even though, according to theJewish Council of Australia, the number of such incidents has been significantly overstated.

A number of Segals recommendations are highly controversial, especially those that may impinge on the intellectual autonomy of universities. While there is clearly an argument to be made that school and university students ought to have a good understanding of the horrors of the Holocaust, they should also be aware of theNakba, in which Palestinians were deported from their traditional homeland a process that continues to this day, of course.

"Deliberately starving and killing children is a war crime. Today, the court has found that punishing someone for sharing facts about these war crimes is also illegal."

But such even-handedness is no more likely in Australia than it is in the U.S. While on a much smaller scale, Australia continues to facilitate the genocide in Gaza by supplyingremote weapon systems, often via third countries, especially the U.S., to maintain the pretence that it is not directly assisting Israel. As Francesca Albaneses report points out, profit-oriented corporate entities have contributed to the dispossession by supplying the weapons and machinery to erase the Palestinian presence.

Not that many universities in Australia would welcome a forensic examination of their relationship with the arms industry either. On the contrary, in another telling indicator of just how taken-for-granted the increased militarisation of life has become even in countries like Australia, universities are falling over themselves to develop courses for, and generally align themselves with, the arms industry and the funding opportunities developments likeAUKUS offer.

Anthony Albanese has assured the Australian public that respectful criticism of the state of Israel and its policies will still be tolerated. Given that this idea still survives in Israel itself, this is the very least we might expect. The bigger question is at what point do the policies of the Israeli Government, which have been described aswar crimesby the International Criminal Court, become completely indefensible?

The endless killing and destruction in Gaza is clearly worse and more cynical than anything that happened in Iraq or Afghanistan, when Australian troops travelled to the other end of the world to stop it. Double standards and alliance politics dont get much more glaring. What does it take for Western governments to get the message about war crimes and atrocities, no matter who may be committing them?

Mark Beesonis an adjunct professor at the University of Technology Sydney and Griffith University. He was previously Professor of International Politics at the University of Western Australia.

Related Articles

• Gaza's destruction continues, but so does the silence
• Greta Thunberg and crew kidnapped as Israeli forces seize Madleen
• Criticism of Israel and of genocide is not antisemitic
• Claims of morality do not reconcile with utter savagery
• Israel proclaims itself chief mourner, as Gaza lies in ruins